<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d14779823\x26blogName\x3dDrop+Frame\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLACK\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttps://dropframefilm.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://dropframefilm.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d5499623103170489414', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Juiced: Soderbergh's Achievements in "Ocean's Twelve"

03 October 2005

So, I am nearly ten months behind on this discussion, but having recently seen a certain movie, I am prepared to make a statement that – to members of my generation of film goers – will be largely frowned upon: Soderbergh’s "Ocean’s Twelve" is better than Soderbergh’s "Ocean’s Eleven." Better, because it is a gag, not a necessity. Better, because it is a good time, not a time that we are all too used to seeing.

Let me tell you what I mean.

"Ocean's Eleven," Steven Soderbergh’s wildly popular 2001 remake of the 1960 Rat Pack venture, is a fine film and an excellent example of a cinematic recreation that outshines its parentage in almost every way. Soderbergh departs from the original film's campy – at the time necessary – musical solos and slapstick routines to make the heist of a Las Vegas casino a serious cinematic core framed by a very nice comedic interplay. The central heist is more deliberately envisioned, the core cast is debatably stronger as an acting troupe than Sinatra, Martin, and Davis Jr., and as for the filmmaking, Soderbergh – a fifteen year veteran of the independent film scene – brings his film in leaps beyond the first, with details placed in scene – like a computerized diagram of the heist route in the background that mistakenly goes into the bathroom – suggesting that the set had creativity to spare.

Of course, "Ocean’s Eleven" was one of several high-profile movies about high-profile heists that came out at the time, half of them remakes: "The Thomas Crowne Affair" (John McTiernan, 1999), "Gone in Sixty Seconds" (Dominic Sena, 2000), "Snatch" (Guy Ritchie, 2000), the aptly-titled "Heist" (David Mamet, 2001), "The Score," (Frank Oz, 2001), "The Good Thief" (Neil Jordan, 2002), "The Italian Job" (F. Gary Gray, 2003), and "The Ladykillers" (Joel and Ethan Coen, 2004). While the heist genre rarely goes out of style, this list seems like a heavy concentration. And "Ocean’s Eleven" is certainly one of the best among them.

The problem is that these films are all fairly formulaic. The team of bandits get together with wind of some lead or a hot tip from the female love interest. We have the time-tested veteran, the one who is probably too old for the job, the enthusiastic kid who at some point plans to do the job himself or skip out on them all or take the money for himself (usually Ed Norton), the sexy female partner, the ruthless villain, the technical genius – most often a punk kid but sometimes the black guy who likes to wear odd hats – the well-to-do marks and so on. The object of their affections range from stockpiles of money to gold to paintings to diamonds, but always the devised plan is flawless and daring if it was not, on the face of it, impossible; hence the need for the movie. And everything goes along swimmingly, until the intelligent and assuasive cop shows up, or the goods get moved, or the diamonds once stolen get stolen by someone else, or the one unexpected twist moment occurs to show us how they really did it; the Keyser Soza billboard moment, if you will, right at the end of the film.

Not all of these items apply to every film, of course, but as a primer, it works fairly well: select three to five units from the character list, find an exotic item to steal, make sure the lead is cocky, intelligent, has a criminal history, and can do a few turns with Rene Russo on the dance floor, and add a few plotline snags on the way to the eventual heists of the century; will there ever be a character in this kind of movie who fails at achieving the impossible?

Additionally, these films are all marked by very polished camera work often taking advantage of exotic surroundings like Las Vegas or Monte Carlo. Thus, in all of them, we have precise setups, mostly stable cameras, intriguing lighting designs often evoking film noir, some very controlled camera movements and every once and a while a brilliant sequence surrounding the heist involving music (see the use of Nina Simone in "The Thomas Crowne Affair" particularly... then see Steve McQueen in "The Thomas Crowne Affair").

With the exception of "The Good Thief" – which is already an anomaly in this list for doing the best to break the above cliches while retaining their smoke – these films are also marked by high end actors, and no film achieves the realm of star power more than "Ocean’s Eleven": George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Julia Roberts, Andy Garcia, Don Cheadle, Elliot Gould, Carl Reiner, Bernie Mac, Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, and so on.

But the film cannot escape its lineage as a heist movie, no matter how well it has been made. It flows nicely through the standard snafus and problems, but they are still standard. It crescendos well into the last few plot twists, but it has a tacked on "years later" moment at the end that could be dispensed with. In short, it may be the best of the class of aught one, but its still a member of the class, like the empty space in the line at graduation, the diploma for the kid who was too good to show up with the rest of the group: awarded but not unnoticed.

Three years later – a "years later moment" we shall not dispense with – Soderbergh delivered his anxious audience "Ocean’s Twelve," which upped the star-power ante to include Catherine Zeta-Jones, Bruce Willis (playing himself), Albert Finney, and a few foreign stars: Englishmen Robbie Coltrane and Eddie Izzard in bit parts and white-hot French actor Vincent Cassel as rival thief "The Night Fox." The audience was largely disappointed. I will tell you now, though, that the movie cashes in.

Filmed in twenty-one locations including Rome, Monaco, Amsterdam, Paris, and Lake Forest, Illinois, "Ocean’s Twelve" is a fun, stylistic reversal of everything Soderbergh did in the first film. The heist is not one heist, but several, moving in very rapid pace. The camera work is much less polished, at times even slipping into an ungainly handheld shot that, at one moment, does not quite capture the car exploding on the other side of Brad Pitt’s head. At least, not without a drastic step to the right (see frames left; this may have been a rehearsed move to keep the car obscured, but I doubt it). The editing is much more jumpy and almost tourist film titles mark the movement from place to place; they are reminiscent of 1950 and 60s era European films, which heightens the European-ness of "Ocean’s Twelve" in general.

"Ocean’s Twelve" is, after all, distinctly European. Its attitude is laid back, take-it-easy, nothing too fast, relaxed and groovy (to borrow an expression from one of the film’s cast members). This, I’m willing to bet, is the point.

Soderbergh was a brainchild of the American "independent" film movement. He jump-started the Sundance Film Festival in 1989 with "Sex, Lies, and Videotape," really the first great film the festival had, which coincidentally set it off on the path toward becoming the international shoulder-rubbing convention it is today. Soderbergh spent several years dealing with his sudden cult celebrity by searching for an identity in several failing films. He soon found himself in dire need of another big hit: "I knew I had to pull my head out of my ass and start thinking about the economic realities of making films," he told Peter Biskind in the book "Down and Dirty Pictures," "I needed to make a decision about whether or not I was content in working on the margins." "Out of Sight" (1998) was the first in what Soderbergh said was a "conscious attempt on my part to enter a side of the business that was off-limits to me, because I had marginalized myself." Moreover, it was the beginning of Soderbergh’s now familiar one-for-them, a-few-for-me strategy:

– "Out of Sight" followed by "The Limey" (1999), "Erin Brokovich" (2000), and "Traffic" (2000)
– "Ocean’s Eleven" followed by "Full Frontal" (2002) and "Solaris" (2002)
– "Ocean’s Twelve" soon to be followed by "Bubble" (2005), "The Good German" (2005), based on the novel by Joseph Kanon with Clooney in the title role, and the highly anticipated biopic "Che" (2006), starring Benicio Del Toro.

"I don’t know what else you’re supposed to do with whatever juice you’ve got at the moment other than get interesting movies made," Soderbergh said, "We’re trying to move as quickly as we can before that juice runs out."

In this light, and in the light of what Soderbergh says in "Down and Dirty Pictures" about "Ocean’s Eleven" – "For me, ‘Ocean’s’ made no sense. It was the hardest thing I ever did. It’s a movie about absolutely nothing. I found it just brain-crushing. I never felt fluent, never felt comfortable. Every day I was hanging on by my fingernails." – the sequel must have been made (a) under studio pressure and (b) to have an absolute laugh. Honestly, 13 of the world’s most recognizable actors – most best friends with the visionary director – in nine European locations as well as Las Vegas, and Soderbergh too smart to succumb to "brain-crushing" twice: you’re telling me that any of them are giving this film any amount of serious thought?

Certainly you, the reader, are not trying to tell me this. But you are, imbd.com user "patrickjw," who has only ever taken the time to write a review about "Ocean’s Twelve." He writes:

The film is in desperate need of a better editor, as it is so bloated and ponderous that towards the middle of the film, if you've even managed to keep track of who's stealing what from whom and why they're doing it, you won't even care any more. You'll just be begging for the ending. The film is filled with bizarre camera angles, such as a shot of an incoming airplane that for some inconceivable reason is filmed sideways. There are also some VERY bizarre scenes, such as a scene where Julia Robert's character has to pretend to be Julia Roberts, and a thief break-dances through lasers. However, the biggest flaw of the movie is the absence of a good heist scene. The heist in Ocean's 11 was masterful, and there is nothing in this film that even comes close. I didn't go to see this movie to watch a cop get reunited with her father who happens to be a master thief, I went to see a team of funny people go up against the odds to steal a lot of money. Bottom line: You will hate this movie. Don't waste your money on it.

Question 1: Does a sequel have to be made in the precise vein as the original or can a director take the liberty of having, in this case, "fun"? I think Mr. Soderbergh and I would say absolutely no, by no means does one filmmaker ever have to make two movies the exact same way nor should he/she, to save his, her, and our sanity. The jury vote does not seem to be unanimous, however. A discussion for a later date, certainly.

Question 2: Why so harsh? Relax and learn to take films in the manner in which they were intended. Or at least learn to take things easier. The camera angles nor the described scenes are bizarre. The plane comes in sideways, fine, but one would think Mr. W would also comment on the moment when the word "Amsterdam" is spelled out by individual letters over postcard images of the city. Why is one camera angle out of however many bizarre, and, more to the point, why is that bad for the film? Also, to ignore the comment about the truly graceful scene of Vincent Cassel gliding through the laser field – done in a way both pastiche and parody of that cliche scene – Julia Roberts playing Julia Roberts pangs somewhat of Soderbergh’s "Full Frontal," where Roberts plays an actor on and off screen, and pangs definitely of Roger Mitchell’s "Notting Hill" (1999), where Roberts plays most-famous-actress-in-the-world Anna Scott. Surely, Mr. W does not think "Notting Hill" bizarre. Further, isn’t Roberts as Tess playing Julia Roberts part of the fun of the film, and isn’t that fun reflected in the film’s credits, which say, "And introducing Tess as Julia Roberts"?

What movie goers had trouble avoiding, it seems, were comparisons between "Eleven" and "Twelve." Clearly, Soderbergh did not care to make one like the other, and the result is an outlash against the latter film for its pure childishness, for its non-resemblance to a movie at once cliche and beloved.

Be aware, those who, like me, are late in coming to "Ocean’s Twelve," that it is just a good-time-had-by-all film: total fun, from beginning to end, without an breath of seriousness. On the level of plot – the level "patrickjw" is thinking on – sure, the movie is flawed: Terry Benedict, the ruthless casino owner gangster, is ultimately unlikely to let Ocean’s group of cons simply repay their debt and the sudden emergence of the long lost missing father and his secret identity both seem coincidental and tacked on. But what does it matter when its just a fluff, multi-million dollar venture?

In the end, "Ocean’s Twelve" overflows with energy and enjoyment, in front of and, certainly, behind the lens. A lot of the film comes off as ad libbed, with almost hokey references to the actors’ films throughout: Matt Damon’s Linus telling Bruce Willis he had predicted the ending of "The Sixth Sense" or Topher Grace (playing himself) saying he had "phoned it on that Dennis Quaid movie" (i.e. "In Good Company"). A lot of it seems like a running gag between Soderbergh, Clooney, and Pitt. And let us thank someone for that, else Soderbergh might have lost his grip.

Let us thank someone else for what "Ocean’s Twelve" has since achieved: Soderbergh will make his next three movies independent of studios. He also has his hand in ten other films in production, as producer, writer, or director. Clooney, meanwhile, is about to release his second film, "Good Night, and Good Luck," which recreates Edward R. Murrow’s on-air assault on Senator Joseph McCarthy, perhaps the single greatest moment in the history of broadcast journalism. Clooney will be appearing almost simultaneously in the cold war drama "Syriana."

Thank you, for giving them the juice to do that.

-~-

Photo Caption: "I'm not the only one looking for Ocean's Eleven." The explosion of Rusty's Car in "Ocean's Twelve." Note the handheld camera that results in most of the incident being obscured by Brad Pitt's head. From the Warner Brother's Trailer.

Did you know: The word "snafu" comes from American military slang, being a popularized acronym for "situation normal: all fouled (or f---ed) up."

  1. Anonymous Anonymous | 10/03/2005 04:25:00 PM |  

    I have to say I respectfully disagree with you on this one. I think you make some very valid points, and personally my problem with the movie isn't the bizarre shots, which I rather enjoyed, or the Julia Roberts thing, which I simply thought went on too long. And I loved the break dancing through the beams.

    I personally just thought that the movie never really found a coherrent story to tell. I disagree with you that the stuff with Zeta-Jones and Finney being tacked on is "ok" cause it was just multi-million dollar fluff. Partly because I've seen too many good multi-million dollar fluff movies, like Ocean's Eleven, or Pirates of the Caribbean, to forgive movies anymore with that exuse.

    and also because, I don't think you can have it both ways, that it is an intelligent film with a cinematic style that is saying something, and also fluff that means it's ok to leave a story feeling incomplete or hoaky at best.

  2. Anonymous Anonymous | 10/03/2005 08:30:00 PM |  

    dearest art,
    i LOVED this review whole-heartedly! first of all, for it's beautiful craftsmanship and coherency, and second of all because it finally explained to my head and heart why it was ok to enjoy ocean's twelve so very much.

    you see, as a very traditional (read: classic hollywood-based) screenwriter, i have a hard time watching a movie and NOT judging its story and plot in a harsh manner. and i think we can all safely say that plot is NOT the strong point of ocean's twelve, meaning if i were to react in my normal manner, i should shun the movie and argue for an hour and a half with jon about it (who invariably enjoyed it for its visual motifs and blah blah blah).

    BUT i did not do that upon seeing ocean's twelve. i said, hey, this is a weak plot, but you know what? i really enjoyed it for what it was - a fun movie. and you have shown me why that is a legitimate and even intelligent thing to say!

    so now i feel good. and smart.

    but i have to say, i still like the first one more. are you ok with that? i hope we can still be friends.

    much love from lala land...
    kara irene. :o)

  3. Anonymous Anonymous | 10/04/2005 10:08:00 AM |  

    I have to say that even though I have not seen Oceans 12, I have to agree that some movies, although fluff, are genuinely enjoyable. I think as an audience member I tend to try and ascertain the director's intention. As in the case with Pirates of the Caribbean, I got the sense that Johnny Depp and the director were just fooling around with this horribly stereotypical and trite material, thereby making it both enjoyable and sly. It's about not taking yourself too seriously, which I think Soderbergh does. You can have a complete fluff movie that is a depressing disaster, like the recent Star Wars films, because director, Lucas, takes himself way too seriously.

    It's all a laugh in the end anyway, so if you have to do it, you might as well enjoy it.